×

Loading...

BC省数据表明现在疫苗的保护力在下降,一周降2.7%,不知道以后是会继续这样线性下降呢?还是指数下降,只有时间能够证明。今天是大概是BC大规模2针后的第4个月。

新闻:11/8 vs 11/15:

As of Monday, Nov. 8, 2021, 90.3% (4,184,112) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 86.0% (3,986,497) have received their second dose.

Past week cases (Oct. 29 to Nov. 4) – Total 3,346

  • Not vaccinated: 2,018 (60.3%) – 669 (20% under 11) = 1349 (40.3%)
  • Partially vaccinated: 174 (5.2%)
  • Fully vaccinated: 1,154 (34.5%)

Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 22 to Nov. 4) – Total 460

  • Not vaccinated: 297 (64.6%)
  • Partially vaccinated: 28 (6.1%)
  • Fully vaccinated: 135 (29.3%)

对于感染来说,除去20%儿童,

实际感染比例: unvaxx vs 1+ shot: 1349 vs 1328,

人口打针比例: 9.7% : 90.3%,

保护力:89.4%. (计算方式:(1-x)*90.3 : 9.7 = 1328 : 1349)

As of Monday, Nov. 15, 2021, 90.7% (4,203,257) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 86.8% (4,021,455) have received their second dose.

Past week cases (Nov. 5-11) – Total 3,445

  • Not vaccinated: 1,890 (54.9%)  – 689 (20% under 11) = 1201 (34.9%)
  • Partially vaccinated: 181 (5.3%)
  • Fully vaccinated: 1,374 (39.9%)​​​​​​​.

Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 29 to Nov. 11) – Total 336

  • Not vaccinated: 202 (60.1%)
  • Partially vaccinated: 23 (6.8%)
  • Fully vaccinated: 111 (33.0%)

对于感染来说,除去20%儿童,

实际感染比例: unvaxx vs 1+ shot: 1201 vs 1555,

人口打针比例: 9.3% : 90.7%,

保护力:86.7%. (计算方式:(1-x)*90.7 : 9.3 = 1555 : 1201)

有兴趣的可以算算对住院保护力下降多少。

第三针不是要不要的问题,而是什么时候的问题。这样一种可能带来死亡的针,就这么听话一针针打下去?

Sign in and Reply Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / BC省数据表明现在疫苗的保护力在下降,一周降2.7%,不知道以后是会继续这样线性下降呢?还是指数下降,只有时间能够证明。今天是大概是BC大规模2针后的第4个月。 +8

    新闻:11/8 vs 11/15:

    As of Monday, Nov. 8, 2021, 90.3% (4,184,112) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 86.0% (3,986,497) have received their second dose.

    Past week cases (Oct. 29 to Nov. 4) – Total 3,346

    • Not vaccinated: 2,018 (60.3%) – 669 (20% under 11) = 1349 (40.3%)
    • Partially vaccinated: 174 (5.2%)
    • Fully vaccinated: 1,154 (34.5%)

    Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 22 to Nov. 4) – Total 460

    • Not vaccinated: 297 (64.6%)
    • Partially vaccinated: 28 (6.1%)
    • Fully vaccinated: 135 (29.3%)

    对于感染来说,除去20%儿童,

    实际感染比例: unvaxx vs 1+ shot: 1349 vs 1328,

    人口打针比例: 9.7% : 90.3%,

    保护力:89.4%. (计算方式:(1-x)*90.3 : 9.7 = 1328 : 1349)

    As of Monday, Nov. 15, 2021, 90.7% (4,203,257) of eligible people 12 and older in B.C. have received their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine and 86.8% (4,021,455) have received their second dose.

    Past week cases (Nov. 5-11) – Total 3,445

    • Not vaccinated: 1,890 (54.9%)  – 689 (20% under 11) = 1201 (34.9%)
    • Partially vaccinated: 181 (5.3%)
    • Fully vaccinated: 1,374 (39.9%)​​​​​​​.

    Past two weeks cases hospitalized (Oct. 29 to Nov. 11) – Total 336

    • Not vaccinated: 202 (60.1%)
    • Partially vaccinated: 23 (6.8%)
    • Fully vaccinated: 111 (33.0%)

    对于感染来说,除去20%儿童,

    实际感染比例: unvaxx vs 1+ shot: 1201 vs 1555,

    人口打针比例: 9.3% : 90.7%,

    保护力:86.7%. (计算方式:(1-x)*90.7 : 9.3 = 1555 : 1201)

    有兴趣的可以算算对住院保护力下降多少。

    第三针不是要不要的问题,而是什么时候的问题。这样一种可能带来死亡的针,就这么听话一针针打下去?

    • 閆博士在上周末的Covid summit上幽默風趣地說以往的疫苗都需要大量動物試驗數據,可新冠疫苗是所有的動物都坐在那里看着人類試驗的數據,哈哈哈 +7

      Faith, Health, and Hope Global COVID Summit

      November 13, 2021

      • 很棒的视频 +3
      • 著名法轮功网站。 +1
        • 闫小姐的货卖的差不多了
          • 你也賣得差不多了
    • 打疫苗主要是为了即使得了新冠,不会or 减少进ICU... +1
      • 我们美国加拿大公司都有不少人得了新冠,只有一个人进了ICU,这是在大家打疫苗之前。 +5
      • so it is solely for protecting yourself individually. I am fine with that. Now question is then why separate vaxx vs unvaxx? you've already protected and regardless vaxx or not, infection still happens so what is the point? +8

        while actually we know the point: not about covid, only about vaxx!
    • 世卫组织对新冠疫苗有效性的要求是50%以上,楼主的结果高出太多了 +1
      • WHO used to say last for minimum 1 year. cross fingers. +2
        • 你这个是有效期,一字之差呀
          • too bad the effectiveness is going down like a rock, we will see how it goes in another month or so. Meanwhile, enjoy your booster. +3
    • 我听说是一周5%
      • I think it will be "指数下降". may not see much in the first 3 months but will drop rapidlly reaching 5 months. +3
    • 不是终身疫苗的话,保护力肯定会下降的。疫苗的主要作用是防重症,防医院陷入过载状态。 +1
      • 听说是减低自身免疫力。。。20个月以后。。。 +1
        • 根据? +1
          • 现在反疫苗的研究很难发表。就说说我听到的吧,我一同学说,她认识的一位搞科研的研究白血病,以前很难找个病人自愿者,打针以后太容易了。 +3
            • 呵呵,又是传说。
              • Much more reliable than Dr. Tam, 兔博之流。
    • 疫苗对德尔塔变种的保护效力80%左右,不是很早就得出结论了吗 +1
    • 所谓的打了疫苗就不会感染是自欺欺人的想法。大概率,打过疫苗的免疫系统对新冠病毒有一定的识别能力,会应对更及时正确,更大机会是轻症或微症。 +1

      打疫苗, 于社会是减少医院过载的概率,于己是给自身的免疫系统提个醒,尤其是不再年轻的人群。
      • 英国有研究表明疫苗人士感染病毒康复后,体内对付病毒外壳的N蛋白抗体比没打的少得多,再次感染可能性大。 +4
        • 免疫系统除了抗体外,有记忆的B cell和T cell在预防重症上作用更大。人的免疫系统是一个复杂而精确的系统,抗体只是它的一道防线而已。再重复一次,疫苗主要作用不是不感染,是大大降低重症的概率。
          • 呵呵,于是共进的最新疫苗定义吧。这根本就是药嘛。
        • 胡扯
      • 在新冠疫苗之前的疫苗好像都是打了疫苗就不会得病的,难道我一直都理解错了?
        • 想象一下流感疫苗。
          • 还有甲肝乙肝
            • 甲肝疫苗打了还得甲肝?这个我就不知道了。好像乙肝疫苗三针保十年。如果你有了黄金抗体就终身免疫了,不用打疫苗。可新冠疫苗是每三个月一针,可能还没啥用?
              • 有的人打了疫苗也不产生抗体
                • 知道,那也是10年才三针,也不需要乙肝疫苗护照啊。其实也就中国人,本地老外打的人不多。 +1
                  • 我的回复只是针对你说的打了疫苗就不会得病的错误理解
                    • 你是对的,我错了。其实错的是以前都没有需要像新冠疫苗一样当饭吃的疫苗。再说了乙肝疫苗有效期内好像真的不会得病哦……怎么那么多新冠疫苗得主在疫苗有效期内还得病,有的还死了? +1
            • 破伤风也算1个
          • 据说每一种流感疫苗只针对那一种病毒,又据说流感病毒万万种,所以打了也是白打。我从来不打。 +1
            • 流感已经伴随我们100年了,
              人类的免疫系统已经知道怎么对付它,尽管它一直都在变。新冠太新了,你不用疫苗来培训自身的免疫系统,捺只有直接感染了。愿意自然感染的人是赌自己不会重症,这个赌太危险了,因为需要入院治疗的大概率会造成后遗症,后遗症比疫苗可能的风险实在多了。
              • 还有这么科学的说法?那政府可真是不知柴米油盐贵了,每年花这么多的钱宣传流感疫苗。 +1
              • 有研究说孩子打疫苗风险比得病住院高很多倍。有风险,就应该有选择。 +2
                • 小孩子的免疫力强大,是不是要打疫苗的确值得考虑。 +1

                  觉得家长和小孩应该有选择,不应该强制。
            • 不是一种,几种,不过据说猜对的几率也很低
              • 猜对了也没有用,有的是其它种病毒来拜访
          • 人"科学家"是这样解释流感疫苗不防传染的,是预估的疫苗strength和流行流感不一致。起码2021年前流感疫苗不是为防重病的。
      • 英国有研究表明疫苗人士感染病毒康复后,体内对付病毒外壳的N蛋白抗体比没打的多得多,再次感染可能性小
        • 胡扯。 +4