×

Loading...

@Regina

Topic

  • 枫下家园 / 医药保健 / 以前说是千分之五,现在涨到百分之五了。EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data 以前说是千分之五,现在涨到百分之五了。EXCLUSIVE – 100% of Covid-19 Vaccine Deaths were caused by just 5% of the batches produced according to official Government data +6
    An investigation of data found in the USA’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specif…
    • 这样的探索文章好,免得我们要被注射土豆液体 +7
      • 可惜液体没有战胜土豆 +1
        小道消息说,土豆聪明得很,他们夫妻俩的是生理盐水
        • 这世道连土豆都学着要聪明,怎么还有那么多人傻乎乎地挽起袖子排队挨土豆扎呢?回扣老多了吧? +1
    • 5%也太少了,95%还差不多,加拿大每年死亡的30万人里打过疫苗的有29万
    • 如果非常担心自己打的COVID19疫苗, 可以自己查BATCH CODE,看看自己的BATCH CODE是否在那5%之内 如果非常担心自己打的COVID19疫苗, 可以自己查BATCH CODE,看看自己的BATCH CODE是否在那5%之内
      How Bad is my Batch ? How Bad is My Batch Batch codes and associated deaths, disabilities and illnesses for Covid 19 Vaccines home |  Moderna  |  Pfizer  |  Janssen&em…
    • 一个简化的计算,可能算得不太准确。假设95%的疫苗不致死,如果一个人打了5针,那有77%的可能性她/他打的都是不会死人的那些疫苗。如果肯打10针的话,那有60%的可能性打的都是不会死人的那些疫苗。可惜这个论坛上支持疫苗的连5针疫苗都不肯打,更没人打10针,要不然 +3
      一群打了10针疫苗的,有40%的受伤害可能,更容易看出结果。
      • 你们这些人也真行,算个算术都要匿名,是做了亏心事还是咋地。打过两针,有效了,不打是正常做法,难道你们在退烧后,还继续吃完一瓶退烧药,真不知道你们还有这爱好 +3
    • Expose news果然是个臭名昭著的假新闻网站: The Exposé (formerly known as The Daily Exposé) is a British conspiracist and fake news website created in 2020 by Jonathan Allen-Walker. It is known for publishing COVID-19 and anti-vaccine misinformation. Expose news果然是个臭名昭著的假新闻网站: The Exposé (formerly known as The Daily Exposé) is a British conspiracist and fake news website created in 2020 by Jonathan Allen-Walker. It is known for publishing COVID-19 and anti-vaccine misinformation. +1
      • 他们似乎特别热衷转发假新闻网站的东东
      • It's easy to label a website. However, Wiki is not creditable in such aspect. +4
        • 这些人丧失了(大部分)独立思维能力,不看文章就想说文章是错的,总想找个‘权威’替他们选择。可‘权威’让他们继续打疫苗,他们又不打了,所以说他们还有些独立思考能力,不是完全丧失独立思维能力。 LOL +4
      • 连民主党和共和党都分不清的,居然能分辨网站好坏,太难为你了,要不你看看,NIH这个网站也是个骗子吧?呵呵。 +5
        • 原来你连民主党和共和党都分不清,怪不得不能分辨网站好坏,